1) The mentally ill defendant was found unimputable for the crime.

2) Due to his age, the young child was deemed unimputable for his actions.

3) The court determined that the defendant's intoxication made him unimputable.

4) The jury concluded that the defendant's severe mental disability rendered him unimputable.

5) Legal experts debated whether the suspect was unimputable due to his diminished capacity.

6) The defense argued that the suspect's history of trauma made him unimputable.

7) The suspect's extreme emotional state at the time of the crime led to him being found unimputable.

8) The forensic psychologist's evaluation showed that the suspect was unimputable due to his cognitive impairment.

9) The defendant's temporary insanity made him unimputable for the crime.

10) The judge ruled that the suspect was unimputable based on the evidence presented.